See my earlier post. I've been thinking this for years.
The physical side of a relationship, the intimate lovemaking side, is not given the importance it should have when we consider how to keep a relationship solid. It's got immense power to keep a relationship very healthy or to heal, if a couple is seen by each other to make their partner the most important person in their life. Now we're seeing couples discussing the frequency of lovemaking prior to marriage, and even putting it into prenups. Is just the old saw, that you hear from another guy or lady that the good sex life they had died soon after they said "I do". Hopefully, it reflects an honest discussion between the couple about what is important in their relationships, and what they both want to achieve, and then they reflect that in a written agreement, to give it even more importance.
Heaven forbid, I'd have to say to my lover, that our agreement says that we're falling behind our quota while pointing to the clause in the prenup.
I like the idea of date nights or date days that are almost sacrosant for a couple, to ensure that good things for them and their relationship, do actually occur regularly.
Another find over at
The Winnipeg Free Press Online EditionPrenups now have sexual clauses
Stipulations are part of 'designer marriages'
Fri Oct 13 2006
By Misty Harris
AS romantic as "till death do us part" sounds, a new survey of family law attorneys suggests a more accurate vow might be "till sex do us part."
Of the more than 1,600 legal eagles polled by the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, fully 15 per have been asked by clients to include provisions for frequency of intercourse in their prenuptial agreements -- more commonly known as marriage contracts in Canada.
Nearly one in three have been ordered to include stipulations for the care of a pet, 12 per cent have had clients request an adultery clause and another 12 per cent have been asked to include provisions for housekeeping.
It's all part of the made-to-order mentality of what you might call "designer marriages." That is, unions tailored the same way one customizes a new car or condo.
Headlines screaming of celebrities' adultery clauses are increasingly common, with cheating spouses losing a significant financial stake -- sometimes millions -- for breaking their vows. Weight provisos are also finding their way into prenups, such as the contract in which a celebrity husband stipulated if his wife's weight went above 120 pounds, it would be punishable by $100,000 in the event of a divorce.
Another star reportedly requested provisions for random drug testing, while an A-lister's wife asked that her husband be fined if rude to her parents.
Click here..
Michael Cochrane, a Toronto lawyer and author of Surviving Your Divorce, says this sort of celebrity-centric reportage has helped create an entire mythology around prenups.
"Lawyers on the street who are doing these (contracts) for real-life people are generally not seeing those kinds of clauses pushed hard, although people do ask," he says. The challenge is that behavioural provisions are historically very hard, if not impossible, to enforce after a couple exchanges vows.
"Let's say somebody phones up and says: 'My husband's playing too much golf,"' says Cochrane. "And you want us to what? Write him a letter saying he should play less golf or you'll get a divorce? Real life doesn't work like that."
In Canada, he says courts are more likely to enforce clauses governing moral or religious judgment, such as whether or not the children will be given corporal punishment, the type of education they receive, and whether or not they receive blood transfusions in the event of an accident.